Julien De Cuyper vs Vitorio Stankov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. De Cuyper vs V. Stankov

Julien De Cuyper
FRA
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
17
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Vitorio Stankov
BUL
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
17
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Cuyper 1 - 0 Stankov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Julien De Cuyper winning 2 and Vitorio Stankov winning 0. The last match between Julien De Cuyper and Vitorio Stankov was at the M15 Hua Hin, 26-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Julien De Cuyper getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cuyper | 1 |
| Stankov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Hua Hin(10-26-25)
Julien De Cuyper
6
6
Vitorio Stankov
3
0
J. D. Cuyper vs V. Stankov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 37.11% (95-161) | Career Total W/L | 25.00% (3-9) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. D. Cuyper vs V. Stankov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julien De Cuyper has won 35.65% of points on their second serve, while Vitorio Stankov has won 38.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julien De Cuyper, in recent form, has won 44.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vitorio Stankov has won 44.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.98% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Julien De Cuyper has saved 44.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vitorio Stankov has saved 46.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Julien De Cuyper has won 35.48% of matches played (W/L 11/20), with Vitorio Stankov winning 25.00% (W/L 3/9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Julien De Cuyper has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 28% (W/L 11/29). Vitorio Stankov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Julien De Cuyper has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 11/16), where as Vitorio Stankov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25.00% of matches (W/L 3/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Julien De Cuyper winning 1 times and Vitorio Stankov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Julien De Cuyper winning 2 and Vitorio Stankov winning 0.
- The last match between Julien De Cuyper and Vitorio Stankov was at the M15 Hua Hin, 26-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Julien De Cuyper getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:28.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julien De Cuyper has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.1 while Vitorio Stankov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julien De Cuyper has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vitorio Stankov has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Julien De Cuyper has converted 35.90% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vitorio Stankov has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Julien De Cuyper vs Vitorio Stankov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. D. Cuyper vs V. Stankov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:12:28 | Average Match Time | 1:12:28 |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve % | 70% (38/54) |
| 72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (19/38) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 57% (31/54) | Return Points Win % | 34% (17/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Cuyper 44%, Stankov 39%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Cuyper 48%, Stankov 44%.
Break Points Saved %: Cuyper 49%, Stankov 46%.
J. D. Cuyper Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 3-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 ret. | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
V. Stankov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-5 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 3-6 7-5 10-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 1-6 7-6(4) 10-1 | ||

J. D. Cuyper vs V. Stankov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.11% (95/161) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 39.08% (222/346) | Sets Win/Loss | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 45.10% (2363/2877) | Games Win/Loss | 38.84% (94/148) |
| 41.86% (54/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 34.78% (24/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 28.57% (16/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 325 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 615 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 286.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 61% (6199/10223) | 1st Serve % | 69% (121/175) |
| 61% (3767/6199) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (62/121) |
| 43% (1750/4024) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (21/54) |
| 44% (405/922) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 39% (3832/9741) | Return Points Win % | 34% (54/159) |
| 10.00% (1/9) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.21% (94/152) | Futures W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 37% (93/252) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 45% (14/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (26/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 84% (101/85) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 16% (101/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 6% (155/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (8/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction07:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:45
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0
07:10
H2H 0-0
07:10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal